BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//Research School Political History - ECPv6.16.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Research School Political History REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H X-Robots-Tag:noindex X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/Paris BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:20180325T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:20181028T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:20190331T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:20191027T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:20200329T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:20201025T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:20210328T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:20211031T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:20220327T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:20221030T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:20230326T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:20231029T010000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221108T130000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221213T150000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20221031T143135Z LAST-MODIFIED:20221107T122904Z UID:4172-1667912400-1670943600@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:RMA Course – What is political history? DESCRIPTION:Supervisors: dr. Peter van Dam and dr. Jeroen van Zanten (both University of Amsterdam) \nWhat is political history? Among historians and social scientists definitions of and approaches to political history have diverged immensely. In this course\, students explore approaches relevant to the history of politics and discuss the conceptualization of political history and the use of key concepts.  \nThe course will be held weekly from 13:00h until 15:00h. URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/rma-course-what-is-political-history/ LOCATION:University of Amsterdam\, Oudemanhuispoort\, Room A 0.08 CATEGORIES:OPG/RSPH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221104T120000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221104T154500 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20221019T123151Z LAST-MODIFIED:20221107T122850Z UID:4155-1667563200-1667576700@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Outreach and Communication DESCRIPTION:Supervisor: prof.dr. Dirk Jan Wolffram (Groningen University) and dr. Adriejan van Veen (Radboud University Nijmegen)\nNB: This seminar takes place in Utrecht\n \n\n\n\nThis seminar is dedicated to the science outreach and communication – vis-à-vis both academia and the public at large – of the individual PhD projects of the participants. Invited speakers from academia\, publishing\, and journalism will provide information and share experiences on publishing a PhD thesis\, presenting scientific results for a larger audience\, and publishing in scientific journals. URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/outreach-and-communication/ LOCATION:Universiteit Utrecht\, Drift 21 CATEGORIES:OPG/RSPH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221028T131500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221028T170000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20221019T121835Z LAST-MODIFIED:20221107T122831Z UID:4147-1666962900-1666976400@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Introduction to the discipline: What is Political History? DESCRIPTION:Supervisor: prof. dr. Ido de Haan (Utrecht University) \nIn this tutorial\, we will discuss the very general\, yet at the same time crucial question ‘what is political history?’ The discipline of political history has changed quite dramatically in the last couple of decades. From a well-established\, yet also rather stuffy history of national political institutions\, it has become a vibrant study of the political as it manifests itself in a variety of places and a multiplicity of forms\, and is informed by various disciplines\, ranging from law and philosophy to political science and anthropology. In this tutorial\, we discuss reflections on the history of ‘the political’ and invite you to reflect on your use of the term\, how your research is a contribution to an interdisciplinary political history\, and how you account for processes like politicization and depoliticization. URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/introduction-to-the-discipline-what-is-political-history/ LOCATION:Oudezijds Achterburgwal 185\, Amsterdam CATEGORIES:OPG/RSPH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20220923 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20220924 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20220701T132119Z LAST-MODIFIED:20221107T122354Z UID:4074-1663891200-1663977599@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:RSPH Opening Academic Year DESCRIPTION: URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/rsph-opening-academic-year/ CATEGORIES:OPG/RSPH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20220627 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20220702 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20220518T104036Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220518T104058Z UID:4007-1656288000-1656719999@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Summer School: Bringing Politics Back In(to) … Environmental Studies DESCRIPTION:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/bringing-politics-back-into-environmental-studies-2/ URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/summer-school-bringing-politics-back-into-environmental-studies/ LOCATION:Groningen END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20220623 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20220625 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20220110T092759Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220518T103905Z UID:3856-1655942400-1656115199@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:International congress DESCRIPTION:RSPH-APH conference: let’s meet again in 2025 URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/3856/ END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20210924 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20210925 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210604T071711Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210604T071711Z UID:3614-1632441600-1632527999@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Opening Academisch Jaar DESCRIPTION:Op 24 september a.s. vindt de opening van het academisch jaar van de OPG plaats. Nadere aankondiging volgt. URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/opening-academisch-jaar-2/ CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210705T080000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210709T170000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210317T090111Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210317T090111Z UID:3540-1625472000-1625850000@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Summerschool: How to write the history of political ideologies? Neoliberalism as idea and practice DESCRIPTION:In this summer school\, we will discuss how to study the history of ideologies: how are they formulated by philosophers\, intellectuals\, politicians\, or scientific experts? Amsterdam or Utrecht\, 5-9 July 2021\, Supervisor prof. dr. Ido de Haan). More information and how to register. URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/summerschool-how-to-write-the-history-of-political-ideologies-neoliberalism-as-idea-and-practice/ END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210602T094500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210602T103000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210521T123732Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210521T123755Z UID:3590-1622627100-1622629800@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Promotie Miel Groten DESCRIPTION:Zie: https://fgw.vu.nl/nl/nieuws-agenda/agenda/2021/apr-jun/02juni_mp-groten.aspx URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/promotie-miel-groten/ CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210520T111500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210520T121500 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210409T115749Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210409T115749Z UID:3576-1621509300-1621512900@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Promotie Wouter Linmans DESCRIPTION:Donderdag 20 mei\, om 11:15 uur\, zal Wouter Linmans zijn proefschrift verdedigen (en de presentatie van het boek) ‘De oorlog van morgen. De Nederlandse beeldvorming van een volgende oorlog 1918-1940’\, aan de Universiteit Leiden. \nPromotoren zijn: Henk te Velde\, Ben Schoenmaker en (co-promotor) Dennis Bos. \n  URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/promotie-wouter-linmans/ LOCATION:tba CATEGORIES:Events ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Omslagbeeld-De-oorlog-van-morgen-zonder-rug.jpg END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210423T163000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210423T190000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210331T082457Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210331T082509Z UID:3555-1619195400-1619204400@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Webinar “The permanent crisis of democracy” DESCRIPTION:23 April\, 4.30PM-7PM (CEST) / 10.30AM-1PM (EDT)\, online\nAn online webinar with Jens Hacke (Universität der Bundeswehr München)\, Martin Conway (Oxford University) and Nadia Urbinati (Columbia University) and junior researchers.\nThe Association for Political History\, in collaboration with the European Institute and the Queen Wilhelmina Chair for Dutch Studies (Columbia University\, NYC)\, the Netherlands Research School for Political History and the Department of History of Utrecht University\, organize a webinar on the permanent crisis of democracy. Registration and more information URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/webinar-the-permanent-crisis-of-democracy/ CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210326T140000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210326T160000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210219T122007Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210219T122007Z UID:3523-1616767200-1616774400@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Rethinking repertoires: popular politics in the long nineteenth century DESCRIPTION:Online seminar Research School Political History\, 26 March 2021\n\n\nRethinking repertoires: popular politics in the long nineteenth century\nOnline\, 26th of March\, at 2 p.m.\nThe inspiration of this seminar is Charles Tilly’s work on protest repertoires. According to his work\, repertoires of popular protest changed fundamentally along the nineteenth century. Strikes took the place of food riots\, charivaris made way for demonstrations and tax rebellions left the stage for public meetings. In this seminar\, our aim is to see if Tilly’s riot-to-demonstration thesis can withstand recent trends in political history. These trends include the substitution a national for a more local\, or transnational perspective\, the focus on everyday history instead of major events\, and a broadening of our understanding of what it means to “act political”. \nAs such\, recent historical studies have made our picture of popular politics and protest repertoires richer and more diverse\, but also more disconnected than ever. This fragmentation begs the question if there is still a larger story to tell about the nature of “popular politics” in the nineteenth century. Our seminar wants to address this question by revisiting the work of the late Charles Tilly. In the first part\, two keynote speakers will introduce the theoretical stakes: Maartje Janse (Leiden University) and Katrina Navickas (University of Hertfordshire). In the second part\, researchers will present a few case studies to add some empirical flavor to the debate\, after which there will be a general discussion\, and a chance for reactions\, questions\, and reflections from the audience. \nThe meeting is designed to provide inspiration to beginning researchers and doctoral students as well as to seasoned academics. Research master students can write a 500 word report on the seminar\, to be published on the website of  the OPG. Writing a report is rewarded with 1 ECTS. \nOn behalf of the Research School Political History\, we warmly invite everyone to attend our online seminar on the 26th of March\, at 14 p.m. A Zoom-invitation will be provided after registration. \nPlease register before 15 March 2020 by sending an email to bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl \nOrganizing committee. Jasper Bongers\, Martin Schoups\, Dirk Jan Wolffram \nTime table:  \n14.00-14.45       Keynotes and discussion \n– Katrina Navickas\, Revisiting the Politics of Contention and Charles Tilly’s methodologies in a Digital Humanities Age \n                             – Maartje Janse\, Expanding the repertoire: A transnational perspective \n14.45-15.00       Break \n15.00 -16.00      Presentations and panel discussion \n– Adriejan van Veen\, Repertoires of depoliticization\, 1800-1850 \n– Antoine Renglet\, Popular Violence toward Police Officers in Belgian Cities\, 1789-        1814 \n– Martin Schoups\, Taking the streets: repertoires of the crowd in urban space\, Antwerp\, 1884-1936. \nOrganizers and speakers \nJasper Bongers is a PhD candidate at the Open University. His research concerns the ways in which citizens have attempted to (co-)shape institutions of public health in the city of Utrecht\, 1850-2000.  \nDr. Maartje Janse is associate professor at Leiden University. She has published on the history of social movements and is currently working on a transnational study of the ‘invention’ of the pressure group in the decades between 1820 and 1840.  \nDr. Katrina Navickas is a reader in history at the University of Hertfordshire. She has published on the history of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century protest\, among others the monograph Protest and the Politics of Space and Place\, 1789-1848 (Manchester University Press\, 2015).  \nDr. Antoine Renglet is a post-doc researcher at Goethe University Frankfurt. He has published on the history of police forces and public order (18th-19th century)\, and is currently working on the history of urban policing in Napoleonic Europe.  \nMartin Schoups is a PhD candidate at Ghent University. His project examines street politics in the port city of Antwerp\, ca. 1880-1940. \nDr. Adriejan Van Veen is assistant professor at Radboud University Nijmegen. He has published on the history of political and societal organization and is currently working on the interlinked history of civil society and political culture in Dutch towns between 1780 and 1860. URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/rethinking-repertoires-popular-politics-in-the-long-nineteenth-century/ CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210323T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210323T173000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210217T110313Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210226T085028Z UID:3514-1616515200-1616520600@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Masterclass Frank Biess DESCRIPTION:German Angst. Fear and Democracy in the Federal Republic of Germany\n23 March 2021\, 4-5.30 PM (ECT) (online)\nOpen to research master students\, PhD candidates\, postdocs and invited researchers \nThe Research School for Political History and the Duitsland Instituut Amsterdam invite you for a masterclass with Frank Biess (Professor of History at UC-San Diego).  In this masterclass\, we will survey new approaches to postwar history\, informed by recent interdisciplinary insights generated by the field of emotion studies. Starting point for the discussion is the new book by Frank Biess (UC San Diego)\, German Angst. Fear and Democracy in the Federal Republic of Germany (OUP 2020). \nIn this book\, Biess analyses how in West Germany\, fear and anxiety both undermined democracy and stabilized it. By taking seriously postwar Germans’ uncertainties about the future\, this study challenges dominant linear and teleological narratives of postwar West German ‘success’\, while it also transcends the dichotomy of ‘reason’ and ’emotion’. Fear and anxiety were not exclusively irrational and dysfunctional\, but sensitized postwar Germans to the dangers of an authoritarian transformation\, and they also served as emotional engines of new social movements\, including the environmental and peace movements. German Angst also provides an original analysis of the emotional basis of right-wing populism in Germany today\, and it explores the possibilities of a democratic politics of emotion. \nFrank Biess is Professor of History at the University of California-San Diego. He previously published  Homecomings: Returning POWs and the Legacies of Defeat in Postwar Germany (Princeton UP\, 2006) as well as a series of edited volumes and articles. A German version of German Angst was published in 2019 as Die Republik der Angst\, Eine andere Geschichte der Bundesrepublik. His main research has focused on the post-1945 period with an emphasis on memory\, emotions\, gender\, and political cultures. His new project explores the interwar Weimar Republic as a one of the first postcolonial states. \nThe master class is open to Research Master Students\, PHDs\, postdocs\, and invited researchers. RMA and PhD students affiliated to RSPH and DIA have priority. RMA students who prepare a one-page written question based on the readings receive 1 credit. If you wish to do so\, please contact the convenor Ido de Haan (i.dehaan@uu.nl)  \nProgram\n16.00 Introduction – Ido de Haan (UU)\n16.05 Introduction to the theme of the masterclass – Frank Biess\n16.25 Two PhD presentations followed by comments from Biess – Benjamin Hirschfeld (DIA/UvA)\, Annelotte Janse (RSPH/UU)\n16.50 General discussion\, based on questions from and to students \nRegistration\nParticipants need to register at bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl before March 18 2021 and will receive a link to the meeting. \nReadings:\nFrank Biess\, German Angst: Fear and Democracy in the Federal Republic of Germany (Oxford 2020) and the special issue New Narratives for the History of the Federal Republic of Germany\, Central European History 52 (2019). Readings will be provided upon registration. \nThe Masterclass will be followed by the Amsterdam German Studies Lecture  “New visions of German history” by Frank Biess (see below for more details). \nPlease note that you have to register with https://spui25.nl/ to be able to attend the lecture. \nThe Duitsland Instituut Amsterdam in collaboration with the Research School for Political History\, the Goethe Institute Amsterdam and Spui25 announces the Amsterdam German Studies Lecture \n“New visions of German history” \nby Frank Biess (Professor of History at UC-San Diego) \n23 March 2021\, 6-7.15 PM (ECT) (online) \nIn a special issue of Central European History\, Frank Biess\, together with Astrid Eckert\, pleads for new narratives for the history of the Federal Republic of Germany. Too often\, German postwar history has been depicted as a success story of a country which eventually arrived in the fold of Western liberalism. Coming from the darkest decades\, the Federal Republic developed into a stable democracy adhering Western values\, attitudes and customs. Historians tend to describe German postwar society as ‘too good to be true’. Biess and Eckert stress the vulnerability of this discourse of Westernization. Uncertainty about the future of Western-style modernity makes it necessary to rethink the history of the Federal Republic and to question its success stories. How does pollution fit into the narrative of the economic miracle of the 1950s? What is the place of women in the gendered myth of 1968\, often misleadingly explained as a clash between Nazi fathers and their antifascists sons? And how do immigrants relate to holocaust memory\, or is holocaust memory used to exclude immigrants from German memory culture? The cesura of 1989-1990 underline the need for a new narrative which moves away from ill-defined concepts of Western modernity. The post-1989 period can no longer function as just an epilogue of the postwar years. In his lecture\, Frank Biess will elaborate on the need for new syntheses of German postwar history. \nFrank Biess is Professor of History at the University of California-San Diego. His main research has focused on the post-1945 period with an emphasis on memory\, emotions\, gender\, and political cultures. He previously published Homecomings: Returning POWs and the Legacies of Defeat in Postwar Germany (Princeton UP\, 2006) as well as a series of edited volumes and articles. He recently also edited the special issue ‘New Narratives for the History of the Federal Republic of Germany’\, Central European History 52 (2019) A German version of German Angst was published in 2019 as Die Republik der Angst. Eine andere Geschichte der Bundesrepublik. His new project explores the interwar Weimar Republic as a one of the first postcolonial states. \nProgram \n18.00 Introduction and chair – Hanco Jürgens (DIA/UvA)\n18.05 Frank Biess on new visions on German history\n18.30 Comments Natalie Scholz (UvA)\, Jacco Pekelder (UU) and Moritz Föllmer (UvA)\n18.50 General discussion \nOpen to general public. \nRegistration via https://spui25.nl \n  \n  URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/masterclass-frank-biess/ LOCATION:online CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210312T121500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210312T141500 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210219T123957Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210219T123957Z UID:3528-1615551300-1615558500@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Workshop applied history DESCRIPTION:The Research School Political History offers a workshop on applied history\, especially for students in the second year of their PhD\, but other students and research masters may apply as well. \nThe workshop will take place online on Friday 12 March 2021\, 12.15-14.15 and will be hosted by prof.dr. Beatrice de Graaf (UU)\, dr. Stefan Couperus (RUG) and dr. Harm Kaal (RU). \nParticipants need to register at bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl before 6 March 2021. \nIn her introductory talk professor De Graaf will reflect on the various roles of historians in public debate and commissioned research projects\, based on recent experiences with commissioned work herself\, for example in the committee for Intercountry Adoption. Which skills and insights do historians bring to the table? Where to draw the line between (applied) historical research and policy recommendations or political interpretations? This will be followed by a plenary discussion about how students see their own role as historians outside of academia and in the public sphere. The discussion will be guided by prepared statements. The final part of our interactive workshop is dedicated to a discussion of applied history\, again based on students’ prepared notes. \nAssignment 1: the public historian outside of academia \nThe current climate of polarized public debate prompts a reflection on how you\, as a historian\, want to position yourself in this\, being informed by academic (historical) knowledge and skills. A historian’s presence in the public sphere might be subsumed under a range of “registers” or “personae”. One can take an activist\, political and critical stance based on one’s expertise\, stick to a more reflective scholarly persona stressing one’s role as an academic historian\, become actively involved in commissioned research and related policy discussions or reach out to the broader public by popularizing historical research. Which of these (or other) registers or personae would you prefer and why? In all of these cases academic historians find themselves in a context in which they have to negotiate and/or cross the boundaries between “academia” and “the world beyond”. Which risks are involved in taking a more public role (by engaging with public debate in (digital) media\, be it by writing op-ed\, by joining a policy council or publishing a popular article\, among others) and how do you see yourself dealing with those risks? \nWrite a short statement (no more than 1 A4) in preparation for the discussions during the workshop in which you reflect on these questions. For inspiration\, one could browse through the Twitter timeline or op-eds of historians like Mary Beard\, Niall Ferguson\, Leo Lucassen\, Beatrice de Graaf\, Karwan Fatah-Black\, Geerten Waling\, Olivette Otele\, Anton Jäger\, Henry Rousso\, Simon Schama\, Timothy Snyder\, Dipesh Chakrabarty\, Barbara Engelking\, Samuel Moyn and many more. \nAssignment 2: applied history \nIn Belgium and the Netherlands applied history (finally) seems to be finding its momentum. Leuven-based historians recently initiated Corvus Historical Consultancy and in the Netherlands historians across Dutch universities supported an ‘applied history manifesto’ (in Dutch) published in NRC-Handelsblad in May 2020. Recently\, Utrecht University launched the Klimaat Helpdesk for which historians have provided instrumental input. In 2019\, Dutch historians launched an academic journal dedicated to applied history published by Brill. Historians in the Low Countries are drawing inspiration from examples in the USA and Britain\, among others. In the USA the Belfer Center at Harvard University is leading the way (Allison & Ferguson\, 2016)\, in Britain back in 2002 Cambridge historians founded the historyandpolicy.org platform. Moreover\, academic historians have become accustomed to writing ‘knowledge utilisation paragraphs’ as part of their applications for NWO and FWO funding. This workshop helps you to position yourself in this context and make the case for the added value of the skills\, knowledge and insights you\, as a historian and expert\, bring to the table. \nBased on the reading for this workshop\, we ask you to write a short paper (800-1000 words) in which you discuss the following questions. \n\nhow could I bring the results of my historical research to bear on contemporary problems and challenges?\nwho would my target audience/public be and how could I reach them?\nwhich skills\, knowledge and insights do I as a historian bring in?\nand how do I convince others of the value of these skills\, knowledge insights?\nin what terms can I best articulate the societal impact of my findings (e.g. knowledge application\, contribute (contextual) understanding\, provide a new perspective)?\n\nPlease send both assignments to h.kaal@let.ru.nl and s.couperus@rug.nl by Tuesday 9 March. \nRequirements and credits \n1 EC: Preparing assignments and presentations for the workshop; active participation in the discussion. \nLiterature \nAllison\, Graham & Niall Ferguson (2016). Applied history manifesto \nhttps://www.belfercenter.org/project/applied-history-project#!manifesto \nCorvus (2021). Applied History. A Corvus Working Definition \nhttps://b2077f0f-b24a-4bee-818b-d2930e3cd6dd.filesusr.com/ugd/f76873_05f0043595af478682ec757635418916.pdf \nCrowcroft\, Robert (2018). The Case for Applied History. Can the study of the past really help us to understand the present?\, History Today  68:9. \nhttps://www.historytoday.com/archive/feature/case-applied-history \nGuldi\, J.\, & D. Armitage (2014). Introduction. In: Guldi & Armitage\, The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press\, pp. 1-13. \nhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/books/history-manifesto/introduction/2B0F7EA5D852C49CB8B9838123B67B12 \nMukharji\, A.\, & R. Zeckhauser(2019). Bound to Happen: Explanation Bias in Historical Analysis\, Journal of Applied History 1:1-2\, pp. 5-27. \nhttps://doi.org/10.1163/25895893-00101002 \nin Dutch: \n\nhttps://www.uu.nl/nieuws/adoptie-onderzoek-laat-zien-rol-van-historici-onmisbaar-in-overheidsonderzoeken\nSee also this forum\, with a range of fascinating contributions to the Applied History manifesto that was launched in the NRC Handelsblad\, https://www.historici.nl/manifest-pas-toe-doe-mee-applied-history-in-theorie-en-praktijk/ URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/workshop-applied-history/ LOCATION:online CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210203T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210203T110000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210120T132459Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210120T132459Z UID:3481-1612342800-1612350000@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:RSPH Masterclass with Glenda Sluga DESCRIPTION:The Research School Political History (RSPH) offers Masterclasses by prominent political historians. Masterclasses are open to RMA and PhD students\, and affiliated members of the OPG; others can attend on invitation only. \nIn this Masterclass\, prof. Glenda Sluga will present her upcoming book Inventing an International Order after the Napoleonic Wars (Princeton University Press). Participants will receive two chapters that will be discussed with prof. Sluga. A selection of PhD students and other scholars will be given an opportunity to present the way their own research relates to the work of prof. Sluga in a short position paper. \nProf. dr. Glenda Anna Sluga is an Australian historian who has contributed significantly to the history of internationalism\, nationalism\, diplomacy\, immigration\, and gender\, in Europe and Australia. She is Professor of International History at the University of Sydney. Currently she is Professor of International History and Capitalism at the European University Institute in Italy\, where she is Director of the European Research Council Project ECOINT and Joint Chair of the Department of History and Civilization and the Robert Schumann Centre for Advanced Studies. \nSupervisor of the Masterclass is prof. dr. Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University). She is Professor of Modern Political History and chair of the Political History Department at Utrecht University. \nParticipation in Master classes is not obligatory\, yet when registered\, all participants are expected to come prepared and to have read the literature. Participation is rewarded with 1 EC when you have prepared a position paper (1000 words) and a short presentation of your comments or questions on the theme of the master class.  \nRegistration\nParticipants need to register at bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl before January 28\, 2021. After we have received your registration we will send you two chapters of the new book by prof. Sluga\, as well as a Zoom link for the Masterclass. \nDeadline submission position paper and questions: 1 February 2021 \nPlease submit paper and questions to bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl\, amrdedijn@gmail.com and d.j.wolffram@rug.nl URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/rsph-masterclass-with-glenda-sluga/ CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210202T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210202T110000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210120T132650Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210120T132742Z UID:3483-1612256400-1612263600@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Public lecture by Glenda Sluga (The University of Sydney/European University Institute) DESCRIPTION:“Women and the History of International Thinking”\n\n\nDATE: 2 FEBRUARY 2021\, 9-11AM\nPLACE: ONLINE – REGISTER BY SENDING AN EMAIL TO: AMRDEDIJN@GMAIL.COM\nAbstract \nOver the last few decades\, historians have reshaped the spatial and conceptual contours of intellectual history.  In particular\, the prospect of a global intellectual history has provoked reflection on methods and questions of representativeness that transcend the default national parameters of this sub-field. In my lecture\, I want to invite into these historiographical developments the place of women\, and a specific international framing of ideas and their agents.  My aim is to outline a history of European “International Thinking” from the turn of the 19th century to the mid-20th century\, with women at its centre. I argue that the history of women and international thinking requires us to expand not only where\, but who and what counts in intellectual history. \nBiography \nGlenda Sluga is an Australian historian who has contributed significantly to the history of internationalism\, nationalism\, diplomacy\, immigration\, and gender\, in Europe\, Britain\, France\, Italy\, Yugoslavia\, and Australia. \nShe is a Professor of International History and Capitalism at the European University Institute\, in Italy\, where she is Director of the European Research Council Project ECOINT and Joint Chair of the Department of History and Civilization and the Robert Schumann Centre for Advanced Studies. She is on secondment from her post as Professor of International History at the University of Sydney. URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/public-lecture-by-glenda-sluga-the-university-of-sydney-european-university-institute/ CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210129T130000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210129T160000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20210120T131906Z LAST-MODIFIED:20210120T131914Z UID:3478-1611925200-1611936000@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:OPG Seminar professional development DESCRIPTION:OPG Seminar professional development\n \nInstructors: Prof.dr. Dirk Jan Wolffram\, Dr. Hanneke Hoekstra RU Groningen\nDate and Time: Friday\, January 29\, 2021\, 1-4 PM\nMode: Zoom meeting \nFor PhD students in their third year: Science communication and professional development. The seminars in year 3 are devoted to the individual application and assessment of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity\, theories and concepts\, and methods and techniques as well as science communication and professional development. \nActive participation in\, and contribution to the organization of a seminar is mandatory for 3rd year PhDs\, attendance and participation is open for all PhDs and RMA-students. PhD-students attend at least 5 seminars in the course of their program. \nAims\nScience communication and professional development \nRequirements and credits \n\nPhD-students attend at least 5 seminars in the course of their program. This participation is not rewarded with credits\nReport: students can write a 500 word report on the seminar\, to be published on the website of the OPG. Writing a report is rewarded with 1 EC.\n\nRegistration\nParticipants need to register at bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl. There is a limit of 15 participants; third year PhD-students have priority. After registering\, you will receive a Zoom link.  \nPreparation \nRead: \n\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2015/feb/01/applying-for-a-postdoc-job-here-are-18-tips-for-a-successful-application\nhttps://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07652-y (Why A Postdoc May Not Advance Your Career)\nhttps://beyondprof.com/walking-away-from-academia-when-it-was-your-dream-job/\nWelk gras is groener. Persoonlijke verhalen van gepromoveerden over hun loopbanen binnen en buiten de wetenschap (PDF provided upon registration)\nDiscover the information needed to write a successful Veni-application. What are your findings?\n\nWrite \n\nYour CV\nA (mock) motivation for a job application. Both documents should be send to the moderators of the seminar two days prior to the seminar via: J.Hoekstra@rug.nl\n\nOutline seminar: Academia: should I stay or go? \n13:00-13.15       Science as Vocation? Introduction by Prof.dr. Dirk Jan Wolffram \n13.15-13.35       Laurien Crump: ‘How to gain a Veni Grant’ \n13.35-13.50       Discussion and Questions \nBreak \n14.00-14.20       Erie Tanja:  From Political History to Policy Making. The Blessings of  A Career Outside Academia \n14.20-14.35       Discussion and Questions \n14.45- 15.00      Margit van der Steen\, ‘Careers of OPG Alumni’ \n15.00-15.15       Questions \n15.15-15.45       How to Communicate Your Political Expertise as an Asset for Future Positions: CV/Letter/Social Media/Blog \n15.45-16.00       Round up \nInformation: bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/opg-seminar-professional-development/ LOCATION:Zoom CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20201116T130000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20201116T170000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20201007T090055Z LAST-MODIFIED:20201007T090056Z UID:3269-1605531600-1605546000@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:OPG Workshop Interdisciplinary Approaches to Political History DESCRIPTION:Instructors: Christian Wicke and Iva Peša\nDate and Time: Monday\, 16 November 2020\, 13.00-17.00\, Zoom meeting \nThe national research school for political history OPG offers Workshops for 2nd year PhD students. The workshops are an advanced follow up on the tutorials. Based on the PhD projects of the participants\, interdisciplinarity and advanced methodology is explored and links with topical issues and practical applications are elaborated. PhD students learn to present their project in front of a forum of experts and discuss key choices in their research design. \nAims \n\nDisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity\nMethods and techniques\nCommunication\nProfessional Development\n\nOrganization \nA workshop is a one-day meeting\, focused on practical training and interactive learning\, based on the input and research interests of the participants. Preparation consists of practical assignments related to the individual research project of the PhD-students. \nSpecific topics may change\, depending on the expertise of the workshop conveners and requests of the PhD-students. Topics for the workshops are proposed to the director of studies and supervised by the Workshop Committee. \nRegistration \nParticipants need to register at bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl before 28 October. There is a limit of 15 participants; second year PhD-students have priority. After registering\, you will receive a zoomlink and the readings. \nRequirements and credits \n\n1 EC: Preparing assignments and presentations for the workshop; active participation in the discussion.\n\n\nWorkshop Interdisciplinary Approaches  \nThis workshop looks beyond the limits of the discipline of political history. How do/can other scientific disciplines inspire and inform political history research? Which debates outside the confines of political history are of interest\, and to which debates can your PhD-project contribute? This meeting will particularly be inspired by approaches from the social sciences and social history. We will engage with how to write political history ‘from below’ as well as the challenges of writing political histories of non-Western localities and topics. We will look at relevant examples of interdisciplinarity in political history research\, for example political anthropology\, political economy and political ecology approaches. \nFor this meeting\, you should read (in advance): \n\nEdward Wang\, ‘Toward a Multidirectional Future of Historiography: Globality\, Interdisciplinarity\, and Posthumanity’\, History and Theory 59\, 2 (2020)\, 283-302.\nJenny Wustenberg\, ‘Civil Society Activism\, Memory Politics and Democracy’\, Civil Society and Memory in Postwar Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press\, 2017)\, 1-31.\n\n  \nPreparation \n\nBased on the required readings\, think of the different disciplines the authors consult and/or practice\, before you present your findings during the workshop. Which comments or criticisms do you have on the texts?\nWrite a one-page reflection\, explaining which methods and approaches from other disciplines have inspired your own PhD research\, why and how. Which challenges are you facing in adopting interdisciplinary approaches? Please submit this to pesa@rug.nl and c.wicke@uu.nl by Monday\, 9 November.\n\n  \nOutline workshop \n13:00-13.15       Introduction by Christian Wicke and Iva Peša and explanation of the workshop aims. \n13.15-13.45       Short discussion of readings (Wang and Wustenberg). \n– 5 min break – \n13:50-14.15       Teams of 2 (max 3) students interview each other on the interdisciplinary nature of their theses. Maximum 10 minutes per person. The one-pagers will be circulated in advance. \n14.15-15.15       Interviewers present the research of their interviewees. 3-4 minutes per person. \n– 15 min break – \n15.30-16.25       Christian Wicke will briefly talk about different ideas of interdisciplinarity\, and give examples of his own work\, where more than just history was used. Iva Peša will subsequently give an introduction to ‘political ecology’. Thereafter\, we will discuss the statement: Interdisciplinarity should be part of all political history writing. Explain why or why not\, and also think about the difficulties of interdisciplinarity. \n– 5 min break – \n16.30-17.00       Final discussion: What could be fruitful future avenues for interdisciplinarity in political history? Can you think of any good examples? \n  \nInformation: bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/opg-workshop-interdisciplinary-approaches-to-political-history/ CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20201030T130000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20201030T170000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20201007T084900Z LAST-MODIFIED:20201007T084942Z UID:3264-1604062800-1604077200@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:OPG Seminar Science Outreach and Communication DESCRIPTION:Instructors: Adriejan van Veen (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen) and Dirk Jan Wolffram (RU Groningen)\nDate and Time: Friday\, 30 October 2020\, 1-5 PM. Online meeting \nSeminars\nThe seminars in year 3 are devoted to the individual application and assessment of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity\, theories and concepts\, and methods and techniques as well as science communication and professional development. \nThis seminar is dedicated to the science outreach and communication – vis-à-vis both academia and the public at large – of the individual PhD-projects of the participants. Invited speakers from academia\, publishing\, and journalism will provide information and share experiences on publishing a PhD-thesis\, presenting scientific results for a larger audience\, and publishing in scientific journals. \nActive participation in\, and contribution to the organisation of a seminar is mandatory for 3rd year PhDs\, attendance and participation is open for all PhDs and RMA-students. PhD-students attend at least 5 seminars in the course of their program. \nAims\nScience communication and professional development. \nRequirements and credits \n\nPhD-students attend at least 5 seminars in the course of their program. This participation is not rewarded with credits\nReport: students can write a 500 word report on the seminar\, to be published on the website of the OPG. Writing a report is rewarded with 1 EC.\n\n  \nRegistration\nParticipants need to register at bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl before 9 October. There is a limit of 15 participants; third year PhD-students have priority. After registering\, you will receive a Zoom link.  \nPreparation \nWrite \n\ntwo versions of a one-page abstract of your thesis: one aiming at an audience of professionals\, one for a broader public.\na table of contents of your thesis.\n\nOutline seminar \n13:00-13.15       Introduction by Adriejan van Veen and Dirk Jan Wolffram \n13.15-14.45       Publishing your thesis \nThe publisher: Anja van Leusden (Verloren\, AUP): publishing your PhD-thesis (to be confirmed) \nThe author: Lauren Lauret (University of Leiden): publishing a commercial edition of your thesis \n15.00-16.45       Outreach \nLeonard Ornstein (journalist and professional publisher): presenting your thesis for a large audience \nDirk Jan Wolffram (editor in chief\, BMGN/LCHR): publishing spin-off of your thesis in journals \n16.45-17.00       Round up \n  \nInformation: bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/opg-seminar-science-outreach-and-communication/ CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20201023T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20201023T170000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20201007T104653Z LAST-MODIFIED:20201009T091628Z UID:3278-1603465200-1603472400@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Workshop: Advanced Research Methods and Techniques DESCRIPTION:Workshop in which 2nd-year PhD students reflect on the methodological choices that they have made with Carla Hoetink and Liesbeth van de Grift\nWhen: 23 October\, 15:00-17:00\, online\n \nWe warmly invite you to the first event in the RSPH workshop series. After an introduction to this year’s programme\, we will engage with the existential question ‘What exactly am I doing and how can that be justified?’ \nYou have now entered the second year of your PhD trajectory and will have obtained a clearer view of the research aims and objectives that you are pursuing in your respective projects. You will most likely have made sharper choices with respect to the concepts from which you work\, the period on which you intend to focus\, the primary sources that you will study – some perhaps more consciously so than others. We will use this workshop as an opportunity to take stock of these choices and the ways in which they can be justified with an eye to the research questions that you pose. Is this indeed the way to go if you want to find an answer to this particular research question? What are the limitations and challenges of your chosen method and approach? Are alternatives thinkable and how would you justify your not-using them? \nWe ask you to prepare a concise and structured report (1-2 pages) in which you describe how you will operationalize your research question. What are the choices (in terms of conceptual/theoretical framework\, approach\, source corpus\, periodization\, geographical scope…) that you have made and why? What are the possible implications of these choices for the results of your research project? Have you considered alternatives as well and why have you decided to dismiss them? What choices do you still need to make and what do you need to be able to make them (this workshop may prove of help!)? \nPlease send your essay to c.hoetink@let.ru.nl and l.vandegrift@uu.nl by Tuesday 20 October. We will use the essays as a basis to prepare the group work and plenary discussions. During the workshop\, you will have the opportunity to reflect on your choices and engage in a discussion about their validity and feasibility with your peers. \nTimetable  \n15.00   Opening and introduction to the programme 2020-2021 by Dirk Jan Wolffram/Margit van der Steen \n15.15   Choosing your methods – introduction and discussion by Carla Hoetink and Liesbeth van de Grift \n15.35    Start of group work \n16.00    Break \n16.15    Continuation of group work \n16.45    Where are we at? Plenary discussion about the possibilities\, challenges and limitations of your chosen methods \n  \nInformation:  bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl \nParticipants need to register at bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl before 21 October. After registering\, you will receive a zoomlink (or other online video conference tool). \nLecturers  \n\n Carla Hoetink is assistant professor of Political History at Radboud University Nijmegen\nDr Liesbeth van de Grift is associate professor of International History at Utrecht University\n\n  \n  URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/workshop-advanced-research-methods-and-techniques/ LOCATION:online CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200925T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200925T151500 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20200722T074022Z LAST-MODIFIED:20200901T105348Z UID:3220-1601046000-1601046900@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Opening Meeting OPG DESCRIPTION:“Nutzen und Nachteil” revisited: what’s the use of Applied History? \nWebinar and debate on the opening of the new academic year of the Research School Political History with Ido de Haan\, Irène Herrmann\, Harm Kaal\, Jelle van Lottum and Catrien Santing. \n25 September 2020\, 3-4.15 PM \nWe warmly invite you for the digital opening meeting of the national Research School Political History (OPG)\, organized in cooperation with the Association for Political History. After the introduction of the new PhD´s and the first results of our investigation into the career prospects of PhD´s political history\, we discuss the use of applied history. \nWhy Applied History? \nMany of the currently contested political issues like the response to covid-19\, but also climate change\, the shift in global power\, or the crisis of democracy appear to call for a historical perspective. This is not the only reason why a debate on applied history is of pivotal importance to political historians.  It also focuses our attention on the inescapably political nature of political history. Furthermore\, not only the launch of the newly established Journal of Applied History is a reason to address this theme\, but also the current public debate on the role of historians in the Low Countries. We are happy that participants in the public debate\, Ido de Haan and Catrien Santing\, contribute to our panel discussion. Also the founding fathers of the Journal of Applied History\, Jelle van Lottum and Harm Kaal\, have accepted our invitation. Dirk Jan Wolffram will chair the debate. \nDebate and publications \nRecently\, the historical world of the Low Countries was stirred by the publication of Aan de slag! a manifesto for ‘applied history’. In it\, four prominent historians\, Beatrice de Graaf\, Lotte Jensen\, Rina Knoeff and Catrien Santing\, called for a more active role for historians in public debate and policy decisions\, specifically\, yet not exclusively\, with regard to the current covid-19 crisis. Their appeal was part of a wider plea for applied history\, voiced in previous manifestoes\, e.g. the Applied History Manifesto by Graham Allison and Niall Ferguson and The History Manifesto by David Armitage and Jo Guldi. Their appeal fell on fertile ground in the Netherlands\, as testified by the newly established Journal of Applied History. In the meantime\, the issues raised in the manifesto Aan de slag! have led to further debate\, partly on the website historici.nl and in the general press\, e.g. by Ido de Haan. \nHow to account for the public and political role of political history? \nThe question how to account for the public and political role of political history entails on the one hand a debate about the historical discipline and on the other hand on the nature of the application. Rephrasing the well-known Nietzschean question\, this refers to the question what the use or perhaps disadvantage is of historical knowledge for contemporary debates. To what extent does history contribute to our understanding of the present and the future? How\, by what means\, and with what kind of challenges\, can we “apply” history? But another issue is the nature of application: what are the issues that historians can best address? Is history useful to propose solutions to policy issues\, or is practical value of history to be found elsewhere? And finally: what is the politics involved in applied history\, both in the obstacles historians might need to overcome in order to make their insight productive in public\, political and policy debates. Also\, what is the politics in the call for applied history itself – as part of the wider debate about the value\, use and quality of the humanities?  \nTimetable  \n15.00    Opening and welcome by the chair of the Research School\,  Marijke van Faassen \n15.05    Presentation of the new PhD´s political history \n15.15    Career perspectives PhD´s political history by Managing Director of the Research School Margit van der Steen \n15.20    Start of the debate by chair and Director of Studies Dirk Jan Wolffram \nFive short statements by\, Harm Kaal\, Jelle van Lottum\, Ido de Haan\, and Catrien Santing \n15.50    Question\, comments\, responses and rebuttals \n16.15    End of session. \n  \nInformation:  bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl\nRegistration: email before 23 September to bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl. A Zoom link will be provided.\nParticipation is free of charge \n  \nSpeakers   \n\n dr. Ido de Haan is professor of Political History at Utrecht University and academic director of the Research School for Political History.\n dr. Irène Herrmann is professor of Transnational History at the University of Geneva.\n Harm Kaal is assistant professor of Political History at Radboud University Nijmegen.\n dr. Jelle van Lottum is head of the History Department at Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands and extraordinary professor at Radboud University Nijmegen.\n dr. Catrien Santing is professor of Medieval History at Groningen University.\n dr. Jan Wolffram is professor of the History of Governance and Politics in Modern Times. at Groningen University and director of studies of the Research School Political History.\n\n  \nhttps: //onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl \nhttps: //associationforpoliticalhistory.org \n  \nAmsterdam\, 1 September 2020 \n  \n  \n  URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/opening-academisch-jaar/ LOCATION:tba CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200622 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200627 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20200406T135043Z LAST-MODIFIED:20200515T120014Z UID:3132-1592784000-1593215999@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Summer School DESCRIPTION:The Summer School New approaches to the history of nationalism of the Research School Political History\, will take place online\, participants are informed. Registration is closed. \nTopic\nNations are ‘imagined communities’ that are constructed through ‘invented traditions’. Based on the classical studies by Benedict Anderson\, Eric Hobsbawm and Ernest Gellner\, this still is the dominant modernist interpretation of nations and nationalism. Recently\, however\, various innovative studies have provided fresh interpretations of the rise and evolution of nationalism over the last few centuries. During the summer school\, we will discuss a number of these perspectives and also explore how these can be applied in practice. Well-known experts will present new views on the early modern origins of nationalism\, the role of banal nationalism\, the concept of national indifference\, the influence of the spatial turn\, the rise of right-wing populism and the impact of nationalism on the decolonization process. The keynote speaker will be Siniša Malešević (Professor of Sociology\, University College Dublin)\, one of the most prolific voices in the field of nationalism studies today. Although the geographical focus of the course will be on Europe\, it will be possible to give a presentation dealing with other parts of the world. \nCoordinators: Eric Storm and Diederik Smit (Institute for History\, Leiden University) \nProgram URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/summer-school/ LOCATION:P.J. Vethgebouw 0.06; Nonnensteeg 3; Leiden CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200529T080000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200529T170000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20191122T085221Z LAST-MODIFIED:20200406T142158Z UID:2946-1590739200-1590771600@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Cancelled\, to be rescheduled: Research Seminar "Rethinking repertoires: how ordinary people conducted politics in the nineteenth century" DESCRIPTION:Unfortunately\, we will also have to reschedule the Seminar Rethinking repertoires. More information will follow.\nAll best\, \nRSPH \n  \nRethinking repertoires: how ordinary people conducted politics in the nineteenth century.\nOur seminar on 19th century popular politics and the ways in which ordinary people could shape the world around them is now open for registration. Our starting point is the work of the eminent historical sociologist Charles Tilly\, who put forth the idea of protest repertoires. \nLike street musicians\, ordinary people resort to a limited amount of pre-written “scripts” to express their discontent\, even though many other “tunes” seem possible in theory. This metaphor proved to be an intricate instrument for historical research\, as it acknowledges both the creative agency of historical actors and the structuring determinants limiting their play. \nProtest repertoires changed fundamentally during the 19th century. Strikes took the place of food riots\, charivaris made way for demonstrations and tax rebellions left the stage for public meetings. Or at least\, that is how the classic story goes. We wonder whether Tilly’s riot-to-demonstration thesis can withstand recent trends in political history. Historians have increasingly interchanged a national for a local  or international perspective\, adopted an everyday perspective instead of concentrating on major events\, and broadened their understanding of what it means to “act political”. As a result of this shifting perspective\, it becomes increasingly difficult to think about development in linear terms. \nRecent historical studies have made our picture of popular politics and protest repertoires richer and more diverse\, but also more disconnected than ever. This fragmentation begs the question if there is still a larger story to tell about the nature of “popular politics” in the 19th century. Our seminar wants to address this question by revisiting the work of the late Charles Tilly. In this seminar\, we aim to confront his theories with recent developments in political history and vice versa. Two excellent keynote speakers will guide us through this difficult but rewarding topic: Maartje Janse (Leiden University) and Katrina Navickas (University of Hertfordshire). In addition\, four other researchers will present their own empirical research. \nOn behalf of the Research School Political History\, we warmly invite everyone to attend our meeting on the 29th of May in Ghent\, Liberas\, Kramersplein 23\, 9000 Ghent. For PhDs and RMA-students ECTS can be awarded. \nFor more information\, please send an email to: repertoires.revisited@gmail.com \nPlease register before 15 May 2020 by sending an email to bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl \nAll the best\, \nThe organizing committee. Jasper Bongers\, Martin Schoups\, Dirk Jan Wolffram \n  \nTime table:  \n10.00-10.15       Welcome and introduction \n10.15-11.15       Katrina Navickas\, Revisiting the Politics of Contention and Charles Tilly’s methodologies in a Digital Humanities Age \n11.15-11.30       Coffee break 1 \n11.30-12.00       Antoine Renglet\, Popular Violence toward Police Officers in Belgian Cities\, 1789-1814 \n12.00-12.30       Martin Schoups\, Taking the streets: repertoires of the crowd in urban space\, Antwerp\, 1884-1936. \n12.30-13.15       Lunch break \n13.15-14.15       Maartje Janse\, Expanding the repertoire: A transnational perspective \n14.15-14.30       Coffee break 2 \n14.30-15.00       Adriejan van Veen\, Repertoires of depoliticization\, 1800-1850. \n15.00-15.30       Jasper Bongers\, Repertoires of institutional work\, Utrecht\, 1850-1900 \n15.30-15.45       Coffee break 3 \n15.45-17.00       Round Table\, Rethinking repertoires: how ordinary people conducted politics in the nineteenth century \n17.00-18.00       Drinks \n  \nOrganizers and speakers \nJasper Bongers is a PhD candidate at the Open University. His research concerns the ways in which citizens have attempted to (co-)shape institutions of public health in the city of Utrecht\, 1850-200.  \nDr. Maartje Janse is associate professor at Leiden University. She has published on the history of social movements and is currently working on a transnational study of the ‘invention’ of the pressure group in the decades between 1820 and 1840.  \nDr. Katrina Navickas is a reader in history at the University of Hertfordsire. She has published on the history of 18th and 19th century protest\, among others the monograph Protest and the Politics of Space and Place\, 1789-1848\, Manchester University Press\, 2015.  \nDr. Antoine Renglet is a post-doc researcher at Goethe University Frankfurt. He has published on the history of police forces and public order (18th-19th century) and is currently working on the policing of cities in Napoleonic Europe.  \nMartin Schoups M.A. is a PhD candidate at Ghent University. His project examines how forms street politics changed or persisted in times of political modernization\, in the city of Antwerp\, ca. 1880-1940. \nDr. Adriejan Van Veen is assistant professor at Radboud University Nijmegen. He has published on the history of political and societal organization and is currently working on the connection between civil society and political culture in Dutch towns between about 1780 and 1860. URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/research-seminar-rethinking-repertoires-how-ordinary-people-conducted-politics-in-the-nineteenth-century/ LOCATION:University of Ghent CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200423 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200425 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20191126T113326Z LAST-MODIFIED:20200319T084034Z UID:2956-1587600000-1587772799@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Cancelled: Spring Conference for PhD candidates DESCRIPTION:Cancellation Spring Conference 2020\n\n\nBeste allen\, \nMet veel enthousiasme hebben wij de Spring Conference 2020 van de Onderzoekschool Politieke Geschiedenis onder de noemer Work in Progress: power and politics from a historical perspective georganiseerd. Wij verheugden ons zeer op twee dagen van keynotes\, paper panels\, poster presentations en workshops\, op 23 en 24 april. Maar helaas hebben we moeten besluiten de Spring Conference af te gelasten. De huidige situatie rond de coronacrisis biedt geen enkele zekerheid dat de conferentie doorgang zou kunnen vinden. Daarom willen we nu duidelijkheid geven\, mede om te voorkomen dat de deelnemers de komende weken hun kostbare tijd investeren in voorbereiding op een evenement dat mogelijk\, en zelfs waarschijnlijk\, niet door zal gaan. \nWe houden uitdrukkelijk de mogelijkheid open dat we komend najaar de conferentie\, in al dan niet afgeslankte vorm\, alsnog beleggen. Uiteraard zullen we je daarover te zijner tijd informeren. \nMet vriendelijke groet\, \nKoos-jan De Jager\nLidewij Nissen\nNanka de Vries\nMargit van der Steen\nDirk Jan Wolffram \n\nDear all\, \nIn the past months we have enthusiastically organized the Spring Conference 2020 of the Research School for Political History: ‘Work in Progress: power and politics from a historical perspective’. We very much anticipated two days of keynotes\, paper panels\, poster presentations and workshops\, on April 23 and 24. But sadly we had to decide to cancel the Spring Conference. Due to the present development of the corona crisis we cannot in any way guarantee that the conference will take place. As a consequence we want to give clarity now\, if only to to prevent that participants invest their precious time in preparing for an event that most likely will not take place. If possible\, we will try to hold the conference\, or parts of it\, in the Fall of 2020. We will keep you informed\, \nWith kind regards\, \nKoos-jan De Jager\nLidewij Nissen\nNanka de Vries\nMargit van der Steen\nDirk Jan Wolffram \n  \n\nAll PhD candidates RSPH are invited to present their work during the  two day seminar “Work in Progress” (Utrecht 23-24 April 2020). Read more URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/spring-conference-for-phd-candidates-2/ LOCATION:Universiteit Utrecht\, Drift 21 CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200311T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200311T180000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20191216T111641Z LAST-MODIFIED:20200214T135843Z UID:2995-1583919000-1583949600@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Seminar militaire geschiedenis DESCRIPTION:Op 11 maart 2020 vindt in Antwerpen het jaarlijkse OPG seminar militaire geschiedenis plaats. Thema’s zijn onder meer de omgang met het koloniale verleden vanuit militair-historisch perspectief en het herdenken van oorlog. \nProvisional Program – Research Seminar Military History – Antwerp\, 11 March 2020 \nThe Research School of Political History\, in cooperation with the University of Antwerp\, hosts a one-day seminar on current research in military history and the relevance of military historians in Belgian and Dutch public debates on imperial history and war remembrance. The aim of the seminar is threefold: (1) to present current and discuss current research by PhD students in military history; (2) to debate current issues in societal debates surrounding military history; (3) to provide opportunities to connect with and learn from fellow academics from Belgium and the Netherlands. \nThe seminar will be held on the 11th of March 2020 at the University of Antwerp. We invite all PhD students and historians of military history\, and those of related fields\, to attend the seminar. \nThe first part of our seminar will be devoted to presentations by young scholars working within the field of military history in the broadest sense. All participants are then invited to debate their work and results. \nDuring the afternoon sessions\, two societally and scholarly highly relevant topics will be discussed\, each from both a Belgian and Dutch institutional perspective. \nFirst we will debate the role of the military historian within current debates on (post-)imperial history? In Belgium\, the specificities of its imperial project in the Congo is receiving increasing attention\, while in the Netherlands the Indonesian War of Independence is now the subject of a wide-ranging research programme centred on war and violence. These touch on sensitive issues related to national identities\, post-colonial societies\, and the complicated and violent relationship between (former) colony and metropole. What are the similarities and differences of these debates in Belgium and the Netherlands? What can the military historian learn from these debates and what is the added value of the adjective ‘military’ within this historical context? \nSecondly\, we will discuss the role of the military historian in the remembrance of wars. The year 2020 marks the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II\, while 2018 marked the 100th anniversary of the end of World War I. Both World Wars gained increased public attention with remembrance ceremonies\, documentaries\, films\, book publications\, re-enactments\, museum expositions\, and other activities on international\, national and local levels. What is the added value of the military historian within these activities and the debates on remembrance? How does the discipline of military history evolve in relation to war remembrance? \nInstructions for registration and participation \nPlease send an email to bureau@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl confirming participation in the seminar before 6 March. The RSPH offers lunch and drinks. \n  \nProvisional Programme   \nLocation: Het Brantijzer\, Sint-Jacobsmarkt 13\, room SJ024 and KS104\, Antwerp \n9.30       Coffee and registration \n9.45       Welcome by Margit van der Steen on behalf of Research School Political History \nWelcome by Marnix Beyen on behalf of University of Antwerp \n10.00     Two parallel sessions \nSession 1 \n               Erik Meijer on Maritime Strategy 1930-1950 \nMatthijs Ooms on Maritime Trade Protection 1946-2016 \nDion Landstra on Military Observers in former Yugoslavia \nSenior discussant: Samuël Kruizinga \nSession 2 \nTheo van den Doel on The Netherlands and its veterans (1945-2015) \nPhD candidates t.b.a. \nPhD candidate t.b.a. \nSenior discussant: Nel de Mûelenaere \n12.00    Lunch \n13.00     The military historian and the end of Empire \nMarnix Beyen –  How military history can contribute to a better understanding of the decolonization of Congo \nBen Schoenmaker – Independence\, Decolonization\, Violence and War in Indonesia\, 1945-1950 \nChair: Esther Zwinkels of Rozemarijn Vlijm \n14.30    Tea break \n15.00     The military historian and War Remembrance \nRoel Hijink – Herdenking en herinnering van oorlog in Nederland \nDominiek Dendooven – Herdenking en herinnering van oorlog in België \nChair: Wim Klinkert \n16.30     Concluding remarks: Toon Vrints & Ido de Haan \n17.00    Closure Ido de Haan . \n17.10    Drinks \n18.00     Dinner (optional) \n  \nThe organizers hope to welcome you on this interactive and interdisciplinary seminar. Save the date! \n  \nThe organizers \n  \nKim Bootsma MA \nMatthijs Ooms MSc MA \nRozemarijn Vlijm MA \nProf. dr. Marnix Beijen \nProf. dr. Wim Klinkert \nDr. Samuël Kruizinga \nDr. Margit van der Steen \nResearch School Political History URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/seminar-militaire-geschiedenis-2/ LOCATION:Het Brantijzer\, Sint-Jacobsmarkt 13\, room SJ024 and KS104\, Antwerp CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200210T124500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200210T144500 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20200131T142705Z LAST-MODIFIED:20200131T142705Z UID:3052-1581338700-1581345900@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Promotie Wouter Klem DESCRIPTION:Op 10 februari verdedigt Wouter Klem zijn proefschrift Uit angst geboren. Transnationale politiesamenwerking tegen de anarchistische ‘samenzwering’\, 1880s-1914 in het Academiegebouw te Utrecht. Lees verder URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/promotie-wouter-klem/ LOCATION:Utrecht University END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200207T103000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200207T113000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20200123T081305Z LAST-MODIFIED:20200123T081305Z UID:3043-1581071400-1581075000@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Promotie Erik de Lange DESCRIPTION:Op 7 februari verdedigt Erik de Lange zijn proefschrift Gevaarlijk getij. Veiligheid\, piraterij en imperialisme op de Middellandse Zee\, 1815-1856. De verdediging vindt plaats in het Academiegebouw in Utrecht\, om 10.30uur. Zie verder: uu.nl/ URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/promotie-erik-de-lange/ LOCATION:Utrecht University CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200206T143000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20200206T153000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20200123T081444Z LAST-MODIFIED:20200123T081445Z UID:3045-1580999400-1581003000@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Promotie Koen van Zon DESCRIPTION:Op donderdag 6 februari verdedigt Koen van Zon zijn proefschrift:  Assembly Required: Institutionalising Representation in the European Communities. De verdediging vindt plaats in de aula van de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen\, om 14.30 precies. Zie verder: ru.nl/ \n  URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/promotie-koen-van-zon/ LOCATION:Radboud Universiteit CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191220T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191220T180000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20191018T060839Z LAST-MODIFIED:20191018T060924Z UID:2808-1576834200-1576864800@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:Rampzalig Nederland. De omgang met rampen in Nederland en Vlaanderen\, 1780-1940 DESCRIPTION:In de periode 1780-1940 deden zich in Nederland en Vlaanderen tal van rampen voor die een ontwrichtende invloed hadden op de samenleving. Denk bijvoorbeeld aan de Leidse buskruitramp van 1809 en de grootschalige rivieroverstromingen van 1809\, 1820\, 1855 en 1861. Ook in de koloniën waren rampen als vulkaanuitbarstingen en watersnoden terugkerende fenomenen. Door de opwarming van de aarde en de toenemende dreiging van klimaatrampen heeft het historisch onderzoek naar rampen en rampverwerking een hoge vlucht genomen. Het besef is doorgedrongen dat rampen een grote en vaak blijvende invloed hebben gehad op de ontwikkeling van lokale en nationale gemeenschappen. \nDe interdisciplinaire werkgroep De Moderne Tijd (voorheen De 19de eeuw) organiseert op vrijdag 20 december 2019 het jaarcongres Rampzalig Nederland. De omgang met rampen in Nederland en Vlaanderen\, 1780-1940. Een diverse groep sprekers zal haar licht laten schijnen over verschillende aspecten van de omgang met rampen in de moderne tijd. Hoe werden rampen gerepresenteerd in culturele media\, zoals literatuur\, gedenkboeken\, kranten\, schilderijen\, prenten en kaarten? Hoe kwamen solidariteit en liefdadigheid tot uiting? Wanneer was er bij een rampspoedige gebeurtenis sprake van een ‘nationale ramp’? Welke invloed was er op geloof in God en goddelijke voorzienigheid? \nAanmelden kan tot 10 december 2019 bij Marjet Brolsma (M.Brolsma@uva.nl). Kosten: €25\,-\, inclusief lunch\, ter plekke te voldoen. Voor studenten en promovendi is er een gereduceerd tarief van €15\,-. \nProgramma Jaarcongres De Moderne Tijd 2019: ‘Rampzalig Nederland’ \n09:30-10:00 Inloop met koffie en thee\n10:00-10:15 Inleiding door dagvoorzitter Lotte Jensen (RU)\n10:15-11:30 Sessie I: Hulpverlening en gemeenschapsvorming \nErica Boersma (UL): ‘Solidariteit met verre vreemden: hulpverlening bij stads- en dorpsrampen in de achttiende-eeuwse Republiek’ \nAlicia Schrikker (UL) en Sander Tetteroo (UL en Universitas Gadjah Mada\, Yogyakarta): ‘De politiek culturele beleving van natuurrampen in koloniaal Indonesië\, ca. 1840-1940’ \nRuben Ros (UU): ‘Van naderend onheil naar actuele crisis: een digitale begripsgeschiedenis van de nationale ramp (1750-1850)’\n11:30-12:00 Intermezzo: Objecten van herinnering \nArti Ponsen: ‘Relieken van de Leidse Buskruitramp (1807)’ \nBram Vannieuwenhuyze (UvA): ‘Traumakaarten en/of getraumatiseerde cartografen?’\n12:00-13:00 Lunchpauze\n13:00-14:15 Sessie II: Beeldvorming \nMarita Mathijsen (UvA): ‘Ten voordeele van…’. Liefdadigheidsuitgaven in de negentiende eeuw. \nFons Meijer (RU): ‘Vorst in het vizier. Beeldvorming rond Oranjemonarchen na rampen\, 1815-1948’ \nRon Brand (Maritiem Museum Rotterdam): ‘Empathie of sensatiezucht? De scheepsramp van de ‘Berlin’ in 1907 en de nasleep ervan’\n14:15-14:30 Muzikaal intermezzo \nLotte Jensen (RU): Het Watersnood-Wilhelmus\n14:30-15:00 Pauze\n15:00-16:00 Sessie III: Grensoverschrijdende rampen \nRick Honings (UL) en Judith Bosnak (UL): ‘De uitbarsting van de Krakatau (1883). De letterkundige verwerking in Nederland en Indonesië’ \nAntoon Kuijpers (Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland\, Kopenhagen) en Hans Beelen (Carl von Ossietzky Universität\, Oldenburg): ‘Door het ijs bezet. Onfortuinlijke reizen ter walvisvaart in de achttiende en negentiende eeuw: oorzaken en literaire verwerking’\n16:00-16:30 Slotlezing \nJan Wim Buisman (UL): ‘Onweer. Van straf Gods tot verheven schouwspel’\n16:30-17:00 Slotdiscussie\n17:00-18:00 Borrel URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/rampzalig-nederland-de-omgang-met-rampen-in-nederland-en-vlaanderen-1780-1940/ LOCATION:Universiteitsbibliotheek (Singel 425)\, Doelenzaal\, Amsterdam CATEGORIES:Events ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Rampzalig-Nederland-congres-december-2019.jpg END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191129T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20191129T180000 DTSTAMP:20260601T064121 CREATED:20191122T075630Z LAST-MODIFIED:20191122T075630Z UID:2934-1575019800-1575050400@onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl SUMMARY:KNHG Jaarcongres: Hoe verder na Versailles? DESCRIPTION:Uitnodiging KNHG Jaarcongres 2019 – 29 november 2019: \nDe Vredesconferentie van Parijs (1919): Hoe verder na Versailles? \nHet is dit jaar 100 jaar geleden dat de Vredesconferentie van Parijs plaatsvond. Deze conferentie heeft geleid tot het Verdrag van Versailles en tot andere verdragen met landen die zich\, eind 1918\, als ‘Centralen’ hebben overgegeven aan de geallieerden.  \n \nNederland kwam grotendeels ongeschonden uit de Eerste Wereldoorlog\, en was ook geen partij bij de Vredesconferentie van Parijs. Dat wil niet zeggen dat deze Vredesconferentie voor Nederland geen directe of indirecte gevolgen had of zelfs heeft. Zowel in de periode kort daarna\, maar ook nu nog\, zijn gevolgen merkbaar. Ook wordt vaak algemeen aangenomen dat de Eerste Wereldoorlog eindigde op 11 november 1918\, toen een wapenstilstand werd ondertekend in een bos bij het Franse stadje Compiègne. Toch waren er in grote delen van Europa en Klein-Azië toen en ook daarna nog diverse conflicten gaande. Er zijn bronnen die aangeven dat hierbij nog ongeveer vier miljoen slachtoffers zijn gevallen. Om met Clemenceau te spreken: ‘Oorlog voeren is eenvoudiger dan vrede sluiten’. \nHet KNHG organiseert over deze thematiek het jaarcongres op 29 november 2019 in de Maartenskerk te Doorn en het Museum Huis Doorn. Dit landhuis is onder andere bekend als woon- en begraafplaats van Wilhelm II\, de laatste Duitse keizer. De inhoudelijke organisatie is in handen van Ruurd Casparie (KNHG lid dat onderwerp heeft voorgesteld)\, Beatrice de Graaf (bestuurslid Congressen KNHG\, hoogleraar Universiteit Utrecht en expert op dit onderwerp) en Antia Wiersma (directeur KNHG).\n\nHet programma \n9.30 uur          Inloop en registratie (in Maartenskerk te Doorn) \n10.00 uur        Welkom door dagvoorzitter Beatrice de Graaf \n10.15 uur        Lezing Eckart Conze – End of WWI and the peace Treaty of Paris: the Great Illusion \n10.45 uur        Lezing Henk te Velde – International and Domestic Politics in the Netherlands. Rousing Speeches and Political Agitation in the Aftermath of the War \n12.00 uur        Toelichting op tentoonstelling door Cornelis van der Bas (Huis Doorn) \n12.15 uur        ALV KNHG; voor niet-leden bezoek aan Huis Doorn \n13.00 uur        Lunch \n13.30 uur        Bezoek aan tentoonstelling Huis Doorn voor KNHG-leden \n14.15 uur        Workshops over deelonderwerpen: \n1) Karin van Leeuwen\, Arthur Eyfinger & Vincent Bijman \n– Versailles en het internationaal recht \n2) Stefano Lissi\, Thomas Rayner\, Samuël Kruizinga & Jacco Pekelder \n– Versailles and the Resurgence of the German Question \n3) Beatrice de Graaf\, Ruurd Casparie & n.o.t.g. \n– De Eerste Wereldoorlog die niet ophield. Oorlog\, conflict en conflictbeheersing na 1918 \n4) Cornelis van der Bas \n– Fokker en Wilhelm II. Van onderzoek naar tentoonstelling \n15.45 uur        Afsluitende column door Ruurd Casparie \n16:00               Borrel \n17.30 uur        Einde \n  \nWanneer:                29 november\, 09:30-17:30 \nWaar:                      Maartenskerk\, Kerkplein\, 3941 HV Doorn \nAanmelden:            Meld je aan via het AANMELDFORMULIER. \n  \nDe kaarten \nGeen lid:                                                                € 25\,- \nKNHG-lid regulier:                                               € 15\,- \nStudent geen lid:                                                    € 5\,- \nStudent-lid óf Jong KNHG-lid óf spreker:            GRATIS \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  URL:https://onderzoekschoolpolitiekegeschiedenis.nl/event/knhg-jaarcongres-hoe-verder-na-versailles/ LOCATION:Maartenskerk te Doorn CATEGORIES:Events END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR